Page Not Found
Page not found. Your pixels are in another canvas.
A variety of common markup showing how the theme styles them.
Single line blockquote:
Quotes are cool.
Entry | Item | |
---|---|---|
John Doe | 2016 | Description of the item in the list |
Jane Doe | 2019 | Description of the item in the list |
Doe Doe | 2022 | Description of the item in the list |
Header1 | Header2 | Header3 |
---|---|---|
cell1 | cell2 | cell3 |
cell4 | cell5 | cell6 |
cell1 | cell2 | cell3 |
cell4 | cell5 | cell6 |
Foot1 | Foot2 | Foot3 |
Make any link standout more when applying the .btn
class.
Watch out! You can also add notices by appending {: .notice}
to a paragraph.
This is an example of a link.
The abbreviation CSS stands for “Cascading Style Sheets”.
“Code is poetry.” —Automattic
You will learn later on in these tests that word-wrap: break-word;
will be your best friend.
This tag will let you strikeout text.
The emphasize tag should italicize text.
This tag should denote inserted text.
This scarcely known tag emulates keyboard text, which is usually styled like the <code>
tag.
This tag styles large blocks of code.
.post-title { margin: 0 0 5px; font-weight: bold; font-size: 38px; line-height: 1.2; and here's a line of some really, really, really, really long text, just to see how the PRE tag handles it and to find out how it overflows; }
Developers, developers, developers…
–Steve Ballmer
This tag shows bold text.
Getting our science styling on with H2O, which should push the “2” down.
Still sticking with science and Isaac Newton’s E = MC2, which should lift the 2 up.
This allows you to denote variables.
Page not found. Your pixels are in another canvas.
Published in SocArXiv (R&R at Science), 2024
Preprint We study how geographical diversity among research evaluators affects the success of research producers. If evaluators favor work from their own countries (homophily), then producers from countries well-represented in the evaluator pool will benefit from homophily more often (differential access to homophily), resulting in a “geographical representation bias.” We test if this bias exists in science publishing using peer review data on 205K submissions to 60 journals published by the Institute of Physics Publishing. We find evidence of both homophily and differential access to homophily. Reviewers from the same country as the corresponding author are 4.78 percentage points more likely to review positively compared to other reviewers of the same manuscript. Authors from countries well-represented in the reviewer pool (e.g. USA, China, India) are 8-9 times more likely to be evaluated by same-country reviewers and benefit from homophily. Exploiting a policy shock that led to some papers being reviewed anonymously shows that anonymization causally reduces country homophily to a statistically non-significant level and, consequently, reduces representation bias. Geographical representation bias may be widespread, benefitting authors from wealthier countries that historically produced more research and have greater representation in the evaluator pool. Anonymization is an attractive tool for reducing this bias.
Recommended citation: Zumel Dumlao, James M., and Misha Teplitskiy. 2024. "Lack of Peer Reviewer Diversity Advantages Authors from Wealthier Countries." SocArXiv. May 6. doi:10.31235/osf.io/754e3. https://osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/754e3
About me
This is a page not in th emain menu